Are strict rules playing into the hands of ambush marketers?

4 July 2011 | By Cause4 staff

The official definition of ambush marketing printed in the IOC Olympic marks handbook is as follows ‘A planned attempt by a third party to associate itself directly or indirectly with the Olympic Games to gain the recognition and benefits associated with being an Olympic partner’.

With just a little over a year to go until London 2012, the world is beginning to turn its attention to Stratford, East London. The Olympics is the biggest show on earth but not everyone is willing to pay an astronomical price to be part of the spectacle.

Although ambush marketing is a relatively new title, the concept has been around in one way or another for as long as advertising, sponsorship and marketing has existed. Early examples of the detection of the technique include Kodak in LA in 1984, Nike with the US Basketball Team in 1992 and American Express and Quantas in Norway in 1994 and Australia in 2000 respectively.

More recently Dutch Brewers Bavaria, at the 2010 Football World Cup in South Africa, were caught out when 36 women dressed in bright orange dresses entered the stands of a game between the Netherlands and Denmark. The group immediately attracted the attention of the cameras which led to them all being ejected from the stadium and two were arrested on a charge of organising “unlawful commercial activities”.

If the group had been allowed to stay in the ground would the media attention not have died down very quickly? In my opinion the officials causing the fuss made the problem far worse for themselves by ejecting them from the stadium, and also for Budweiser, the official drinks provider of the tournament.

It will be interesting to see what sort of activity arises around the 2012 games, especially given Honda’s already questionable behaviour. They were recently pulled up for their advertising campaign featuring four British Olympic athletes, allegedly to benefit from a link with the event. But who is everyone talking about – Honda or BMW? Maybe LOCOG’s strict rules are working in favour of the potential ambushers?

The strict rules concerning what it means to be an official sponsor makes the games impenetrable for many potential sponsors.

For example, many cultural organisations willing to be part of the Cultural Olympiad but with activities supported by an unofficial sponsor have found it impossible to navigate LOCOG policy and to take their sponsor alongside, this seems rather anti-Olympian and completely impractical for arts organisations that rely on sponsorship for their day to day existence. The lunacy of some of it almost makes me applaud the creativity of the ambushers – I’m definitely not one to incite such behaviour...but I will watch with interest to see how it all unfolds. It would be so good if a legacy of this games led to more practical sponsorship rules for future games, perhaps the ambushers can incite such good behaviour...!


Back to top

Blog index

“We are pleased to support the development of these materials, through Arts Fundraising & Philanthropy, to provide a comprehensive bank of knowledge and experience that can be easily accessed by leaders of arts organisations and practitioners, both in the UK and internationally. One of our priorities at the Arts Council is to help arts and cultural organisations become more resilient and sustainable as they explore new revenue streams.”

Sir Nicholas Serota, Chair of ACE

More by posts by Cause4 staff

Cause4's Pick of the Month - August 2019

1st August, 2019 | By Cause4 staff

It's a new month and the Cause4 team are excited to introduce another four inspiring individuals that are guiding the way in charity leadership, social entrepreneurship, Trusteeship and Arts Fundraising. Read on to meet our pick of the month for August. 

Cause4’s response to: The UK Civil Society Almanac 2019 Report

15th July, 2019 | By Cause4 staff

The UK Civil Society Almanac Reports, released by the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO), is a crucial source of data that has been providing insights into developments in the voluntary sector since 1996. NCVO has now released its latest annual report, of which the following response will outline key findings including positive growth in terms of grants and investments, whilst public donations and fundraising decline. Diversity in particular has been highlighted as an ongoing issue within the sector throughout the report.  

Cause4's Pick of the Month June 2019

4th June, 2019 | By Cause4 staff

As we approach summer and the longest day of the year this month, we can’t believe quite how fast this year has gone – or the 10 years that led up to our birthday party in May! In our spirit of Sharism, check out our favourite Charity Leader, Entrepreneur, Trustee and Arts Fundraising and Philanthropy Fellow of the Month for June!